To My Fellow Advocates: This is an ongoing campaign in pursuit of the truth. It is a step by step process. It will take time. Paul January 3, 2011 Dear Members and Friends of the Order of Malta,
Chairpersons (see below). I am Jesuit educated (Cheverus High School '68, Portland, ME and Fairfield University '72, Fairfield CT). During the past seven years, I have traveled to Haiti five times on various service missions. On one of these trips I visited with Doug Perlitz, Executive Director of the now defunct, Malta sponsored, Project Pierre Toussaint (PPT) in Cap Haitian, Haiti. Doug and I are both graduates of Fairfield University in Connecticut. By now, you're probably saying, so what? What's this all about? I hope you will decide not to turn your hearts and minds away from the gritty realities of this situation. I ask that you read these and upcoming messages with an open mind and not shut your eyes and ears to the terrible suffering of the Haitian boys who were raped and sodomized. I am often reminded that "contempt before investigation is the greatest form of ignorance." It may be a painful process to go through, but the truth is the truth, like it or not.
Perhaps I am being naive in hoping that Order of Malta members will rally to the cause of truth, justice, amends and reparations for the Haitian boys whose lives have been permanently altered by their abuse. I am always available to speak with you privately. Wishing you and your family a joyous and peace filled New Year. Sincerely, Paul Kendrick 207-838-1319 See below: 1) The Tisdale's letter, 2) My Christmas Eve letter to President Joseph Miller, 3) My December 30th letter to President Miller. Christmas Eve, 2010 Mr. Joseph H. Miller, KM President Order of Malta, American Association Dear Joe, This email comes at an extraordinary time of year ...... Christmas! For most, this is the happiest of days -- a time to celebrate and enjoy the many blessings one has been afforded .... family, friends, food, and gifts - large and small. Who knows, this very email may find you sitting by the fire in your living room reading it on a new iPAD given to you by your wife or children .... a real Norman Rockwell image. Joe, six homeless boys from Cap Haitien, Haiti have just left New Haven for another Christmas on the streets in Haiti. These boys represented the 30 known boys who were sexually abused by Doug Perlitz over the last 10 years. These six, no doubt, will meet up on Christmas morning with many of their former schoolmates from Project Peirre Toussaint who are also now living on the streets. The six will tell their stories of being in New Haven where they all spoke at the sentencing of Doug Perlitz. They will have memories of sleeping on a mattress for the first time and how there was more food to eat than they have ever seen in their lives. Most importantly, they will tell their friends how they stood in front of a judge in a beautiful, huge carpeted room and each told their personal story of how they were raped and sodomized by Doug Perltiz from the age of 11 or 12. They may cry as they talk to their friends but they will know that justice has been served and that they were part of an unprecedented and extraordinary legal proceeding. During the sentencing hearing on Tuesday, Cyrus Sibert, a good man from Cap Haitien, who is the radio broadcaster who first reported on the actions of Doug Perlitz, broke down in tears as he listened to the boys describe their abuse. On two occasions, Robinson Gedeus, who worked at PPT for 10 years, was overcome with emotion as he spoke to the judge in open court about the abuse and the threats and intimidation inflicted on the boys by Perlitz. Sadly Joe, if any child deserves something for Christmas, these children do! But there's no stockings hung for them. There's no one to tuck them in at night or tell them how special they are and how much they are loved. But, Joe, for as long as you've been President of the American Association of the Order of Malta, it appears that you have done everything in your power to ignore the practical and emotional needs of an entire group of homeless and vulnerable boys who were sexually abused at Project Pierre Toussaint. Please know that this is the first of many letters and press releases intended to expose you and at least six of your fellow Malta members as the cause of the downfall of Project Pierre Toussaint. Joe, lets make one thing perfectly clear here: it wasn't Doug Perlitz who brought down Project Pierre Toussaint, it was six members of your Order. And you, President Miller, have done everything in your power to protect these people... these good friends of yours! The six members are: Thomas Tisdale, Jeannie Tisdale Rev. Paul Carrier, S.J., Madeline Lacovara Philip Lacovara Hope Carter Here are some facts: 1) Connecticut Malta Area Chair, Thomas Tisdale was at the courthouse on Tuesday. Tidsdale didn't apologize to the boys of PPT for writing a letter that shut down PPT. He didn't apologize to the boys whom he has called liars. Tisdale didn't bother to thank Cyrus for having the courage to report the boys' abuse on his radio station. Neither did he thank Michael McCooey or the other Haiti Fund Board Members for reporting Perlitz's crimes to the United States government. Tom Tisdale didn't apologize to Robinson for obstructing the operating of PPT. [Background facts: While visiting the U.S. about 5 years ago, Robinson stayed for an extended period with Jeannie and Tom Tisdale. The Tisdales arranged for Robinson to intern at the Tomlinson School in Fairfield, CT. A close friend of the Tisdales, Barbara O'Brien (a teacher at the Tomlinson School in Fairfield), was told by Robinson that Perlitz was sexually abusing kids at Project Pierre Toussaint. O'Brien did not report the abuse to law enforcement authorities. It would be naive and irresponsible for anyone to think that O'Brien didn't tell the Tisdale's about the abuse.] 3) In February 2006, Robinson confronted Perlitz in Haiti and told him to stop abusing the students. In response, Order of Malta member, Malta Chaplain and Connecticut Area Spirituality Director, Rev. Paul Carrier, S.J., didn't talk to Robinson for the next two years. (Carrier and Robinson were very close friends prior to this) 4) In May 2008, when the then chairman of the Haiti Fund instructed Perlitz not to return to PPT because credible allegations of child sex abuse had been brought against him, Dame of Malta, Board of Councillors member and director of Malta's Youth Pilgrimage, Hope Carter, secretly flew to Haiti for the sole purpose of stealing Perlitz's computers. Carter was protecting an accused child molester by removing evidence that could have been used against Perlitz in a criminal trial. It was not until weeks later that Carter, when confronted by the Board of The Haiti Fund about her actions, resigned her position as a Haiti Fund board member. Incredibly, Carter still serves on the Board of Councillors of Malta, the boards of other local Catholic charities in Fairfield County and on the Board of Directors of the Malta sponsored, Sacre Coeur Hospital, in Milot , Haiti, not far from Cap Haitien and the PPT Village. This September 8th letter consisted of 11 bullet points of total fabrication. The mailing of this letter signed by six members of Malta could only be interpreted as a way to completely destroy the goodwill and good name of PPT. After the mailing of this letter, donations to PPT completely dried up and the program was forced to close. [This September 8th letter was sent on the heals of a letter mailed to PPT donors by the Haiti Fund (attached).] 6] Several weeks later in September 2008, yet another Order of Malta member, Attorney Philip Lacovara, told Haiti Fund board members that he "knew for sure" that Perlitz didn't abuse children because he, Lacovara, was the chairman of the Priest Sexual Misconduct Committee for the Diocese of Bridgeport and "he would know." We are now asking the Diocese of Bridgeport to review all sex abuse cases in which Lacovara participated as a board member. Joe, you have known these facts and many others about this case since February 2010 when you became the President of the Order of Malta. In addition to the facts above you have also been aware for almost a year of the financial improprieties conducted by these members (including redirecting donations away from PPT as well as the opening of unauthorized Malta charities). You have also been aware that these six people paraded Doug Perlitz, at the time a publicly accused child abuser, to many Malta events including your white-tie investiture dinner. Most unbelievable, however, Joe, is the fact that after learning of all these facts and probably many more, your first act as President relating to PPT and Haiti was in April 2010 to award Hope Carter a public commendation in Lourdes, France for her "extraordinary work in Haiti." Joe, I have heard stories of the "'old' Order of Malta" and I am aware of the great strides that the Order has made under the leadership of Dan Kelly and others. It is a disgrace (and I'd like to think of great embarrassment to you) that you have allowed the Order to revert back into an exclusive club where members protect each other at the expense of the Order. You can resist my efforts to get to the root of the problem, or you can face the facts and participate in the healing. Of course an examination of what went so wrong at PPT and how Perlitz was able to rape and sodomize so many children for such a long time would be included in the healing. Let me finish Joe, by telling you that I traveled to Haiti in January 2010 to offer support to Cyrus and the boys who were abused. My last visit to PPT was in late 2003 so it was shocking and disturbing for me to return to what is now a ghost town of a school. Yet, I couldn't help but notice the many changes and additions. Thanks to Malta and the generosity of many other donors, the school had 8 new classrooms and was poised for a great future. There was nothing but hard work standing in the way of a successful life for so many street boys in Cap Haitien. Please do not mistake my pursuit of the truth as some sort of vendetta or revenge. We need to do everything we can to protect children in the future. We can't fix the problem, Joe, until we fully understand what happened at PPT that allowed the sexual abuse of children to go on for so many years. However, there is already one thing I know for sure. Certain members of the Order of Malta put their own self serving interests ahead of protecting and caring for the most vulnerable children in the world. The truth will be told. Sincerely, Paul Kendrick Freeport, Maine 207 838 1319 Betrayal of Hope: Pierre Toussaint investigation - Connecticut Post ________________________ OPEN LETTER December 30, 2010 Mr. Joseph K. Miller, KM President Order of Malta, American Association Dear President Miller, Tens of millions of Catholics have inflicted additional insult upon victims of clergy sexual abuse by their failure to demand redress for the crimes committed against children and the cover up of these crimes by bishops, priests and other Church officials. I am including you in this number, President Miller because you are showing great insult to the boys who were sexually abused at Project Pierre Toussaint (PPT) and to the people of Haiti by your personal failure to hold Hope Carter, DM accountable and responsible for her role in the cover up of crimes against children at PPT. You have been aware for almost a year, President Miller, of the following facts about Mrs. Carter: 1. Knowing that there was an investigation being conducted, Project Pierre Toussaint (PPT) Board Member, Hope Carter, secretly went to Haiti to steal two computers used by Douglas Perlitz, but owned by PPT. Carter gave these computers to Perlitz, thereby obstructing justice and the ongoing investigation. 2. Mrs. Carter (with 5 other members of Malta - the Tisdales, the Lacovaras, and Paul Carrier) wrote a 3 page letter of pure fabrication whose sole purpose was to destroy the good will and good name of PPT. The letter resulted in the drying up of all donations to the program and therefore forced the program to close. 3. Hope Carter helped redirect donations intended for PPT to other unauthorized Connecticut based Malta charities. 4. Mrs. Carter paraded Doug Perlitz, a publicly accused child abuser, to Malta events including your white-tie investiture dinner during the time he was being investigated for child sex abuse. The bottom line here, President Miller, is that Carter did everything she could to help Perlitz hide his crimes against children. It was clearly more important to Carter to protect the abuser than to protect innocent children. Let me see if I've got this right. Hope Carter did everything she could to protect and cover up for a child molester and now you're doing everything you can, President Miller, to protect and cover up for Carter. Hope Carter called the abuse victims "liars." She hated them for exposing Perlitz as a pedophile. She retaliated against the victims by using her position in the community to turn donors away, causing the school to be closed and the boys to be abandoned, homeless once again without food and safe shelter. Who is your and Hope Carter's God, Mr. Miller, that you could so despise these suffering abuse victims? The Jesuits taught me that the service of my faith must include the promotion of justice. Hope Carter had choices. Isn't it reasonable to expect that even though Carter disagreed with the majority decision of the PPT board of directors to remove Perlitz, she would have stayed aboard and worked even harder to maintain and preserve the mission of PPT? Please, President Miller, close your eyes and listen to my words. These boys were raped and sodomized by Perlitz in the most disgusting ways imaginable. If the boys didn't cooperate, Perlitz intimidated them by threatening to take away their food or throw them out of school. So why, President Miller, is Hope Carter held in such high prestige by you and the Order of Malta that she still holds influential committee assignments? We all hope to hear your voice soon. Sincerely,
Paul Kendrick. P.S.: A bit about me. I am 61 years old, married, no children and am employed as a financial consultant (in Portland, Maine) for a national brokerage firm. I reside with my wife in Freeport, Maine. My wife is a licensed clinical social worker (LCSW) and has a private practice. I am Jesuit educated (Cheverus High School '68, Portland, ME and Fairfield University '72, Fairfield CT). In 1999, I reached out to a group of Cheverus alumni who were reporting for the first time that they were sexually abused when they were students at Cheverus (in the 1970s) by a well liked, award winning track coach. In addition, other former students were reporting that they were sexually abused by a Jesuit teacher. I began advocating on behalf of the victims, calling for the former Cheverus students to be treated with compassion and understanding. Unfortunately, Cheverus and diocese officials were treating the victims as if they were the enemy. I have continued to advocate on behalf of abuse victims since that time. In 2002, my wife and I participated in a 10 day "Ignatian Immersion Experience" trip to Bolivia. We were immersed in the economy, culture and poverty of the poorest country in South America. The Jesuits were our hosts. During the past ten years: I have served as a volunteer board member for a domestic violence prevention agency (4 yrs.). I have volunteered answering phones once a week on a social service agency's confidential 24 hour "crisis line" (4 yrs.) and served as a volunteer for the Trauma Intervention Program (volunteers are mostly dispatched to scenes of death. Each volunteer is "on call" for three 12 hour shifts each month (2 yrs.). During the past seven years, I have traveled to Haiti five times. |
dimanche 2 janvier 2011
BBC and Ricardo Seitenfus - The Haitian government not being givenits due space in this process.
Envoyé par mon BlackBerry de Digicel
Diplomat in Haiti to be dismissed for criticizing OAS, NGOs
Ricardo Seitenfus claims coup against Préval was suggested
[Abridged translation of an interview by BBC Brazil as published in Folha for December 29. See orginal here and related article here.]
By Fabrícia Peixoto
The representative of the Organization of American States in Haiti for two years, Brazilian Ricardo Seitenfus is due to be fired from his position soon, a development he himself interprets as a response to his "critical position" on the role of the international community in the Caribbean nation's recovery…
BBC Brazil – Have you been notified officially of your dismissal from your position?
Ricardo Seitenfus – No, not yet. I had decided not to take a vacation in December so I could be in Haiti during this delicate phase of the election. But the secretary general (José Miguel Insulza) asked me to take a vacation. I conclude that for the two months, February and March, that I was supposed to remain in Haiti I would no longer be there. But that is not the problem. The most serious thing is what is happening now: the OAS representative is not in Haiti during an electoral crisis. And I have an ability for dialogue with the Haitian government that no one else in the OAS has and that few in the international community have.
–You have been in Haiti for two years. Has there been a recent incident that moved you to adopt this more critical position?
–Right after the earthquake, an exceptional job was done. To the degree that it was possible, Haitians received help, aid… An international joint effort was made that was positive. Meanwhile, when the emergency was over, things began not working as they should. In March, there was a meeting of the donors in New York in which 11 billion US dollars was collected for Haiti. It happened that those resources never got to the country.
An international commission for the reconstruction of the country was created that to this day is searching for its real functions. At any rate, the international community's promises were not kept. And meanwhile the plight of the displaced remains the same.
–All that changed your view of things?
–I would say that I became progressively aware of our limitations and, why not say it, of our failures in Haiti… I mean, we of the international community. Besides that, on November 28, the day of the elections, there was discussion in a meeting of the Core Group (donor countries, OAS and the United Nations) of something that seemed to me simply frightening. Some representatives suggested that President René Préval should leave the country and that we should think about an airplane for that purpose. I heard that and I was horrified. The prime minister of Haiti, Jean–Max Bellerive, arrived and immediately said not to count on him for any solution outside the constitution and he asked if President Préval's mandate was being negotiated. And there was silence in the room. Beside me was Albert Ramdin, adjunct secretary of the OAS, so I could not speak because the OAS was being represented by him. But faced with his silence and that of the others, I asked to be able to speak and reminded them of the existence of the Inter-American Democratic Charter [of the OAS] and that I thought any discussion of President Préval's mandate would be a coup. I was very surprised by the fact that the adjunct secretary of the OAS remained silent in the face of the possiblity of shortening the term of a legitimately elected president.
–But many people argue for a provisional government as a solution to the electoral impasse in the country…
–I was always against that. A provisional government would not have the legitimacy of the ballot boxes and it would be an admission of our failure. If after almost seven years (of the peace mission in Haiti) we do not manage to organize a democratic transfer of power, I wonder how we can make a positive evaluation of the presence of the international community, which came here to bring democracy to the country.
–So your criticisms apply to the peace mission as well?
–After the earthquake the nature of the Haitian challenges changed completely. We are faced with one of the greatest challenges… It is a human venture to reconstruct a country of ten million inhabitants destroyed by a natural catastrophe. We have 1.5 million people on the streets, with 80 percent unemployment, the cholera epidemic.
We cannot limit ourselves to the challenges foreseen, even mistakenly, in 2004 (the beginning of the mission) as a question of security. The situation is much more complicated and demands more than a peace operation.
–But the Brazilian government, for example, has opposed a change in the mandate of the mission… In your opinion, what is that position due to?
–The international system does not have the means to confront a situation like that of Haiti. We have to change the Council. We have to get rid of the nature of the Security Council and change it to a Council for Economic and Social Development. And above all, we have to think that the development of Haiti has to be carried out by the Haitians. If people imagine that it can be done through MINUSTAH and through the NGOs, we will be deceiving the Haitians and deceiving the world's public opinion.
–Is the Haitian government not being given its due space in this process?
–Neither the government nor Haitian society. Being in solidarity is not the same as being a substitute for someone, it is to accompany someone. And we are deciding for them. Now we are getting involved in the electoral process. Let Haitian institutions solve their own problems.
–But there are charges of past episodes of corruption involving the transfer of resources intended for the Haitian government, no? Does the country not have certain institutional limitations?
–It is our fault that they have limitations. We transferred all the resources through NGOs and not through Haitian institutions. Without a doubt the Haitian state is very weak and was worse after the earthquake, losing 30 percent of its personnel.
What do we have to do? Maintain policies of accompanying Haiti that allow the personnel to remain in the country. The charges of corruption are part of an ideological discussion. There is no corruption, there is the perception of corruption. Haiti has no way of being corrupt because the state has no resources.
What can be questioned is how the resources that the NGOs collect, without accounting for them to anyone, are being administered. That is indeed the big question. I make an exception of the work that was done in the emergency, but there cannot be a permanent policy of substituting the NGOs for the state. Haiti is Haiti, it is not Haitong [Haiti-NGO]. No country would accept what the Haitians are forced to accept.
–And what is Brazil's role in this process?
–Brazil has a very large responsibility, because this is the first time that we have a peace mission that is this long and this expensive for us, in which we attempt to demonstrate a different way of acting.
Brazil should take advantage of the fact that there will be a new government in Haiti and a new government in Brazil and make an assessment of six and a half years of MINUSTAH. I am not proclaiming that Brazil should withdraw its troops tomorrow. That will be done after a long discussion, that includes the Haitian government and the United Nations.
Not discussing it would be the big mistake. As though MINUSTAH were a divine truth, a bolt of lightning from the sky, as though there could be no reservations. I have the impression that the quality of a peace operation is inversely proportional to its duration. The longer a peace mission is extended in time, the less value it has. The good peace missions are the short peace missionsC'est un forum de discussion où tous les membres peuvent opiner sur les divers sujets d'actualité dans le respect mutuel pour l'avancement du pays.
Il permet de débattre et de partager des idées, des réflexions et d'apporter des contributions...
C'est un lieu virtuel d'échange de questions et de réponses sur les préoccupations du moment.
Tous les messages postés sur ce forum expriment la vue et opinion de leurs auteurs respectifs, et non pas des modérateurs (excepté les messages postés par eux-mêmes) et par conséquent ne peuvent pas être tenus pour responsables.
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grandsdebats/
<*> Your email settings:
<?ol if:digest=1 ?>
Digest Email | Traditional
<?ol else ?>
Individual Email | Traditional
<?ol /if ?>
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grandsdebats/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<?ol if:digest=1 ?>
mailto:grandsdebats-normal@yahoogroups.com
<?ol else ?>
mailto:grandsdebats-digest@yahoogroups.com
<?ol /if ?>
mailto:grandsdebats-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
grandsdebats-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/